Interactivity
Scales
Selected Measurement
Clark, H. H. and S.E. Brennan (1991) Grounding in communication.
In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine,
and S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp.
127-149). Washington, DC: APA Books.
To what extent does the current design of technology
facilitate performing this activity?
[SCALE: 1
Not At All … 7 To A Large Extent N/A
= Technology Doesn’t Allow]
- Copresence: Feeling of sharing the same physical space
- Visibility: Visibly see the other users
- Audibility: Communicate verbally with other
users
- Cotemporality: Receive messages at roughly
the same time that other members produce them (such as by automatic
notification, instant messaging)
- Simultaneity: Synchronously send and receive messages
- Sequentiality: Keep track of the sequence of
a conversation (such as with threaded discussions)
- Reviewability: Review and revise my own messages
before sending them out
- Revisability:
Revise others messages
Note:
The authors include no further information other than the items listed
above.
Appendix
Cho, Chang-Hoan, and John D. Leckenby
(1999)
Interactivity as a measure of advertising effectiveness: Antecedents and
consequences of interactivity in web advertising,
in Proceedings
of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, ed.
Marilyn S. Roberts, Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, 162-179.
Construct: Cho and Leckenby (1999) postulated three antecedent variables that
predict the degree of interactivity. They are 1) high level of involvement,
2) high perception of message-relatedness between the banner ad and the
target ad, and 3) high perception of message-personalization.
Interactivity is defined by Cho
and Leckenby (1999) as the degree to which a
person actively engages in advertising processing by interacting with
advertising messages and advertisers.
Description:
The final
measures consist of seven-item facet scales. All items are assessed using
5-point Likert-type scales:
- I would click away from this
site right away.
- I would stay in this site
for a while to look at the details.
- I would click into deeper
links to see more information.
- I would search for additional
information.
- I would bookmark this site
for future usage
- I would be willing to provide
my personal information for the advertiser so that the advertiser
could have an ongoing relation with me
Development: N/A
Samples: A total of 203 undergraduate students
in a large southwestern university, divided into two groups, participated
in the survey. Each group was exposed to one of the two versions of banner
ads for four products. Each subject was exposed to a set of banner ads
and linked target ads based on their random group assignment.
(cf. Cho and Leckenby, 1999)
Validity: N/A
Scores: Overall measure means and standard
deviations are provided in table 1-6 across different reference groups.
(cf. Cho and Leckenby, 1999)
Sources: Cho,
Chang-Hoan, and John D. Leckenby
(1999) Interactivity as a measure of advertising effectiveness: Antecedents
and consequences of interactivity in web advertising, in Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising,
ed. Marilyn S. Roberts, Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, 162-179.
Other Evidence: N/A
Other Sources: N/A
References: N/A
|